{ "$schema": "folio-library-entry/v1", "id": "arxiv-2601.04544v1", "blocks": [ { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-000", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "Introduction", "pageStart": 1, "pageEnd": 2, "target": "../sections/sec-000-introduction.md", "narrative": null, "content": "As large language models (LLMs) continue to improve in agent-based scenarios, multi-agent systems\n(MAS) have become increasingly mature. Their core idea is to decompose complex problems into smaller\nsub-tasks, each of which is handled by a specialized expert agent [1]. Representative applications include\nVibe Coding [2] and Deep Research [3].Today, large-scale enterprise systems—such as those in finance,\nhealthcare, education, and cloud computing are also increasingly relying on multi-agent architectures\nto deliver accurate and efficient problem solving capabilities. Despite their broad applica", "truncated": true, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": { "status": "not-summarised" } }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-front-matter", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "Front matter", "pageStart": 1, "pageEnd": 1, "target": "../sections/sec-front-matter.md", "narrative": null, "content": "TCAndon-Router\nTCAndon-Router: Adaptive Reasoning Router for\nMulti-Agent Collaboration\nJiuzhou Zhao∗, Chunrong Chen∗, Chenqi Qiao∗, Lebin Zheng∗,\nMinqi Han∗, Yanchi Liu∗Yongzhou Xu∗Xiaochuan Xu∗Min Zhang∗\n∗Tencent Cloud Andon\n{joskazhao, charentchen, chenqiqiao, lebinzheng}@tencent.com\n{minqihan, yanncyliu, alanxu, xxcxu, alexzmzhang}@tencent.com\nAbstract\nMulti-Agent Systems(MAS) have become a powerful paradigm for building high performance intelli-\ngent applications. Within these systems, the router responsible for determining which expert agents\nshould handle a given query plays a crucial ro", "truncated": true, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": { "status": "not-summarised" } }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/figure-img-p002-2", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Figure", "doco:Figure" ], "kind": "figure", "title": "", "pageStart": 2, "pageEnd": 2, "target": "../images/img-p002-2.png", "narrative": "draft", "content": "Figure 1: Comparison between (a) performance router which routes queries to different sized models (Small LLM vs Large LLM) to balance cost and latency, and (b) task router which routes queries to domain-specific expert agents (ELB Agent, CDN Agent, DNS Agent) to improve accuracy.", "truncated": false, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": null }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-001", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "Related Work", "pageStart": 2, "pageEnd": 2, "target": "../sections/sec-001-related-work.md", "narrative": null, "content": "Performance based routing selects among models of different sizes to balance cost and latency. Hybrid\nLLM[18] proposes a model based on the BERT architecture to assess the difficulty of a query and make\nrouting decisions. Self-REF[19] uses an LLM to output a confidence score, For low confidence, it uses an\nLLM or rejects the answer, while for high confidence, it uses an SLM.\nTask based routing assigns queries to domain-specific expert agents to achieve higher accuracy. This", "truncated": false, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": { "status": "not-summarised" } }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-002", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "Method", "pageStart": 2, "pageEnd": 3, "target": "../sections/sec-002-method.md", "narrative": null, "content": "2\nTCAndon-Router\ndirections. Early approaches largely employed BERT-style encoders [20], formulating routing as a fixed\nsingle-label classification problem grounded in a predefined intent space and model structure. To support\nadding new agents without retraining, some studies shifted toward KNN-based methods, such as com-\nputing similarity between query and agent representations[21], or using query–agent dual-tower models\nor fusion-based cross-encoders [22] to dynamically compute relevance scores. [9]Train a binary classifier\nto determine whether the model performs excellently on a specific ta", "truncated": true, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": { "status": "not-summarised" } }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-003", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "Problem Formulation", "pageStart": 3, "pageEnd": 3, "target": "../sections/sec-003-problem-formulation.md", "narrative": null, "content": "A multi-agent system consists of a set of expert agents with different domain specializations. Let A =\n{a1, a2, ..., aN} denote the set of all available expert agents. In real systems, each expert agent is not hard-\ncoded into the router through a fixed identifier; instead, it exposes its capabilities and responsibilities\nto the routing model through a natural-language description. We denote this description as di, and\ndefine a natural-language ”encoding function” g such that g(ai) = di.The set of all descriptions is\nD = {d1, d2, ..., dN} Given a user query q, the router does not operate direc", "truncated": true, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": { "status": "not-summarised" } }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-004", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "Dynamic Agent Addition", "pageStart": 3, "pageEnd": 3, "target": "../sections/sec-004-dynamic-agent-addition.md", "narrative": null, "content": "Traditional methods typically bind a router R to a fixed agent set A, when A changes R must be\nretrained. In TCAR, adding a new agent requires only appending anew to the existing set, yielding\nA′ = A ∪{anew} which produces a new description set D′ = D ∪{dnew}, The routing process then\nbecomes (Cq, Aq) = R(Prompt(q, D′)), Aq ⊆A, meaning that the router R itself does not need to be\nmodified or retrained to support newly added agents. This property greatly improves efficiency and\nusability in real-world enterprise environments.\n3.3", "truncated": false, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": { "status": "not-summarised" } }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-005", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "Multi-Agent Conflicts", "pageStart": 3, "pageEnd": 4, "target": "../sections/sec-005-multi-agent-conflicts.md", "narrative": null, "content": "Selecting Multiple Agents. Traditional task routing typically formulates routing as a single-label\nclassification problem:R(Prompt(q, A)) = ai ∈A meaning that each query can only be assigned to a sin-\ngle agent. This formulation implicitly assumes strict and mutually exclusive domain boundaries, as well\n3\nTCAndon-Router\nas a clearly defined intent space—assumptions that rarely hold in real enterprise environments. When\nmultiple agents are simultaneously suitable for handling a query due to overlapping domain responsi-\nbilities or cross-domain problem characteristics, an agent conflict occurs,", "truncated": true, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": { "status": "not-summarised" } }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-006", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "Training TCAR", "pageStart": 4, "pageEnd": 6, "target": "../sections/sec-006-training-tcar.md", "narrative": null, "content": "To endow the router R with both multi-agent selection capabilities and interpretable reasoning, we adopt\na two-stage[28] training strategy. We first apply supervised fine-tuning (SFT)[29] to teach the model\nthe basic “reason–then–select” pattern. We then further enhance the quality of agent selection and the\nstability of reasoning through reward-based reinforcement learning using DAPO [30].\nSupervised Fine-Tuning. In the first stage, we train the model using labeled data with standard\ncausal language modeling. SFT equips the model with the following capabilities: (i) performing semantic\nalignm", "truncated": true, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": { "status": "not-summarised" } }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/figure-img-p005-2", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Figure", "doco:Figure" ], "kind": "figure", "title": "", "pageStart": 5, "pageEnd": 5, "target": "../images/img-p005-2.png", "narrative": "draft", "content": "Figure 2: Execution pipeline architectures. (a) Solo Agent: the router selects a single solver agent to respond directly to the query. (b) Refining Agent: the router selects candidate solver agents (Solver Agent A, B, C) running in parallel, and a downstream Refining Agent aggregates and reconciles partial responses into a unified Final Answer.", "truncated": false, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": null }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-007", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "Experiments", "pageStart": 6, "pageEnd": 6, "target": "../sections/sec-007-experiments.md", "narrative": null, "content": "We present the experimental results and analyses.\n4.1", "truncated": false, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": { "status": "not-summarised" } }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-008", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "Experimental Setup", "pageStart": 6, "pageEnd": 7, "target": "../sections/sec-008-experimental-setup.md", "narrative": null, "content": "This section introduces the datasets, baselines, evaluation metrics, and implementation details used to\nevaluate TCAR. All experiments focus on the core task of multi-agent domain routing, aiming to thor-\noughly assess TCAR’s effectiveness under domain conflicts, ambiguous intents, and real-world enterprise\nscenarios.\nDatasets. We conduct evaluations on four public intent-classification datasets and one internal enter-\nprise dataset:\n• CLINC150 [14]: Contains 150 intent categories covering everyday conversational scenarios. The\ntask boundaries are clear, but the large number of classes leads t", "truncated": true, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": { "status": "not-summarised" } }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-009", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "Main Results", "pageStart": 7, "pageEnd": 7, "target": "../sections/sec-009-main-results.md", "narrative": null, "content": "Table 1 presents the performance of all models across the five datasets (CLINC150, HWU64, MINDS14,\nSGD, QCloud). Overall, general-purpose LLMs such as GPT-5.1 and DeepSeek-v3.1 outperform most\nsmall-scale open-source models by a considerable margin.\nDespite having only 4B parameters, our\nTCAR achieves state-of-the-art performance on all datasets except CLINC150. CLINC150 contains 150\nintent categories, resulting in extremely long prompts (averaging 18k tokens), which pose challenges for\nsmaller models that struggle with ultra-long sequence processing. On multi-turn (SGD) and multilingual\n(MIND", "truncated": true, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": { "status": "not-summarised" } }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-010", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "Ablation Studies", "pageStart": 7, "pageEnd": 9, "target": "../sections/sec-010-ablation-studies.md", "narrative": null, "content": "To systematically analyze the contribution of each component in TCAR, we conduct ablation studies\nalong three dimensions: reasoning capability, training strategy, and the source of RL initialization.\nEffect of Reasoning This experiment evaluates the impact of explicit reasoning chains[10] on routing\nperformance.\n• Without reasoning: The model performs direct classification prediction and outputs only Aq.\n• With reasoning: The model first generates Cq as an explicit and interpretable reasoning chain\nand then outputs the set of agents Aq.\nWe evaluated both settings on the public datasets and the", "truncated": true, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": { "status": "not-summarised" } }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-011", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "Conclusion", "pageStart": 9, "pageEnd": 9, "target": "../sections/sec-011-conclusion.md", "narrative": null, "content": "• Reasoning capability is a key factor for improving routing interpretability and robustness.\n• RL is an essential training stage that enhances recall while maintaining high precision.\n• The choice of RL initialization point is crucial; Slerp-based models offer stronger generalization\nand are less prone to entropy collapse during RL.\n5", "truncated": false, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": { "status": "not-summarised" } }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-012", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "Analysis", "pageStart": 9, "pageEnd": 9, "target": "../sections/sec-012-analysis.md", "narrative": null, "content": "After validating the overall effectiveness of TCAR through the main results and ablation studies, we\nfurther analyze its behavioral characteristics and internal mechanisms from multiple perspectives. This\nsection provides an in-depth examination of error types, reasoning quality, multi-agent collaboration\neffects, and system efficiency, offering a more comprehensive understanding of the model’s strengths and", "truncated": false, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": { "status": "not-summarised" } }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-013", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "Limitations", "pageStart": 9, "pageEnd": 9, "target": "../sections/sec-013-limitations.md", "narrative": null, "content": "5.1", "truncated": false, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": { "status": "not-summarised" } }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-014", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "Error Analysis", "pageStart": 9, "pageEnd": 10, "target": "../sections/sec-014-error-analysis.md", "narrative": null, "content": "To systematically understand the major sources of routing errors, we categorize the mistakes and observe\nthat TCAR’s errors primarily fall into three types: (1) Incomplete problem descriptions.\nUser\nqueries may lack key information. For example, in “What should I do if my webpage loads slowly?”,\nalthough TCAR’s reasoning often infers that multiple agents are needed, the lack of essential context\nmay still lead to deviations; see Appendix B. (2) Insufficient understanding of highly domain-\nspecific scenarios. In Tencent Cloud use cases, the model sometimes struggles with understanding\nspecialize", "truncated": true, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": { "status": "not-summarised" } }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-015", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "Multi-Agent Collaboration Analysis", "pageStart": 10, "pageEnd": 15, "target": "../sections/sec-015-multi-agent-collaboration-analysis.md", "narrative": null, "content": "Multi-agent collaboration effectively supplements information from different perspectives. In Tencent\nCloud troubleshooting scenarios, multiple agents are often required to jointly diagnose and resolve issues,\nas a single agent is typically insufficient. Moreover, the Refining Agent demonstrates strong capability in\nreconciling conflicting responses. With RAG support, the Refining Agent compares and filters multiple\ncandidate answers using the knowledge base, enabling conflicting opinions to converge. For instance, in\ntroubleshooting scenarios localization tasks, partial correctness from differ", "truncated": true, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": { "status": "not-summarised" } }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-016", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "prompt", "pageStart": 15, "pageEnd": 15, "target": "../sections/sec-016-prompt.md", "narrative": null, "content": "TCAR Prompt:\nYou are a Router Agent. Your job is to determine which Agents should handle the user’s issue based on\nthe chat history.Your goal is to select the appropriate Agents to ensure the problem can be solved efficiently\nand accurately. You may select up to 3 Agents.\n# Agent List\n{agents}\n# Notes\n+ The Description is each Agent’s capability description. When selecting an Agent, you must ensure that\nits capabilities clearly allow it to resolve the user’s problem.\n+ If no Agent can reasonably handle the problem, output ”oos” in the tag.\n# Output Format\nOutput in XML format. If multiple", "truncated": true, "provenance": "ingested", "summary": { "status": "not-summarised" } }, { "id": "library/arxiv-2601.04544v1/blocks/prose-sec-017", "types": [ "folio-assistant-core:Prose", "doco:Section" ], "kind": "prose", "title": "Badcase", "pageStart": 15, "pageEnd": 16, "target": "../sections/sec-017-badcase.md", "narrative": null, "content": "Incomplete problem descriptions\nInput Query: What should I do if a webpage loads very slowly?\nTCAR Output:\n The user reports that “the webpage loads very slowly,” which requires diagnosis from both the\nnetwork path and acceleration layers. The Network Agent can analyze public/private network latency, packet\nloss, jitter, and path quality. The CDN Agent can examine CDN access latency, origin fetch behavior, and\ndistribution policies. If EdgeOne is being used, the EO Agent should investigate origin latency, edge node\nissues, and configuration problems. \nnetwork_agent\n