{
  "$schema": "folio-library-document/v1",
  "id": "arxiv-2510.21603v1",
  "title": "Doc-Researcher: A Unified System for Multimodal Document Parsing and Deep Research",
  "variant": "pdf",
  "pages": 13,
  "tocSource": "outline",
  "tocMethod": null,
  "toc": [
    {
      "level": 1,
      "title": "Abstract",
      "number": null,
      "page": 1,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-000-abstract"
    },
    {
      "level": 1,
      "title": "Introduction",
      "number": "1",
      "page": 1,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-001-1-introduction"
    },
    {
      "level": 1,
      "title": "Related Work",
      "number": "2",
      "page": 2,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-002-2-related-work"
    },
    {
      "level": 1,
      "title": "Method: Doc-Researcher",
      "number": "3",
      "page": 3,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-004-3-method-doc-researcher"
    },
    {
      "level": 2,
      "title": "Deep Multimodal Document Parsing",
      "number": "3.1",
      "page": 3,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-005-31-deep-multimodal-document-parsing"
    },
    {
      "level": 2,
      "title": "Multimodal Retrieval Architecture",
      "number": "3.2",
      "page": 3,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-006-32-multimodal-retrieval-architecture"
    },
    {
      "level": 2,
      "title": "Multimodal Deep Research",
      "number": "3.3",
      "page": 4,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-003-33-multimodal-deep-research"
    },
    {
      "level": 1,
      "title": "M4DocBench Benchmark",
      "number": "4",
      "page": 4,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-007-4-m4docbench-benchmark"
    },
    {
      "level": 2,
      "title": "Motivation of M4DocBench",
      "number": "4.1",
      "page": 4,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-008-41-motivation-of-m4docbench"
    },
    {
      "level": 2,
      "title": "Domain and Document Collection",
      "number": "4.2",
      "page": 5,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-009-42-domain-and-document-collection"
    },
    {
      "level": 2,
      "title": "Annotation Process",
      "number": "4.3",
      "page": 5,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-010-43-annotation-process"
    },
    {
      "level": 2,
      "title": "Benchmark Statistics",
      "number": "4.4",
      "page": 5,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-011-44-benchmark-statistics"
    },
    {
      "level": 1,
      "title": "Experiment",
      "number": "5",
      "page": 5,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-012-5-experiment"
    },
    {
      "level": 2,
      "title": "Evaluation Metrics and Benchmarks",
      "number": "5.1",
      "page": 5,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-013-51-evaluation-metrics-and-benchmarks"
    },
    {
      "level": 2,
      "title": "System Setting and Baselines",
      "number": "5.2",
      "page": 6,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-014-52-system-setting-and-baselines"
    },
    {
      "level": 2,
      "title": "Multimodal Retrieval System Results",
      "number": "5.3",
      "page": 7,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-015-53-multimodal-retrieval-system-results"
    },
    {
      "level": 2,
      "title": "Main Results: Multimodal Deep Research",
      "number": "5.4",
      "page": 7,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-016-54-main-results-multimodal-deep-research"
    },
    {
      "level": 2,
      "title": "Ablation Study",
      "number": "5.5",
      "page": 8,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-017-55-ablation-study"
    },
    {
      "level": 2,
      "title": "Parsing and Deep Research Efficiency",
      "number": "5.6",
      "page": 8,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-018-56-parsing-and-deep-research-efficiency"
    },
    {
      "level": 1,
      "title": "Conclusion",
      "number": "6",
      "page": 8,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-019-6-conclusion"
    },
    {
      "level": 1,
      "title": "References",
      "number": null,
      "page": 9,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": "sec-020-references"
    },
    {
      "level": 1,
      "title": "A M4DocBench: Supplementary Materials",
      "number": null,
      "page": 10,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": null
    },
    {
      "level": 1,
      "title": "B Implementation Details",
      "number": null,
      "page": 10,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": null
    },
    {
      "level": 1,
      "title": "C Extended Experimental Results",
      "number": null,
      "page": 10,
      "pageLabel": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "evidence": null,
      "source": "outline",
      "section": null
    }
  ],
  "sections": [
    {
      "id": "sec-front-matter",
      "number": null,
      "title": "Front matter",
      "level": 1,
      "pageStart": 1,
      "pageEnd": 1,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 47,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "zhang",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "wang",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "liu",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "Doc-Researcher: A Unified System for Multimodal Document Parsing and Deep Research Kuicai Dong∗, Shurui Huang∗, Fangda Ye∗, Wei Han, Zhi Zhang, Dexun Li, Wenjun Li, Qu Yang, Gang Wang, Yichao Wang, Chen Zhang, Yong Liu Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. * denotes co-first authors; correspond to {dong.kuicai, liu.yong6}@huawei.com",
      "extractCut": false
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-000-abstract",
      "number": null,
      "title": "Abstract",
      "level": 1,
      "pageStart": 1,
      "pageEnd": 1,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 426,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "zhang",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "wang",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "components",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "preserve",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "work",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "com",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "requires",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "existing",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "Deep Research systems have revolutionized how LLMs solve com- plex questions through iterative reasoning and evidence gathering. However, current systems remain fundamentally constrained to textual web data, overlooking the vast knowledge embedded in mul- timodal documents: scientific papers, technical reports, and finan- cial documents where critical information exists in figures, tables, charts, and equations.",
      "extractCut": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-001-1-introduction",
      "number": "1",
      "title": "Introduction",
      "level": 1,
      "pageStart": 1,
      "pageEnd": 2,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 966,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "doc ument",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "total annual",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "query characteristics",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "comprehensive benchmark",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "plan",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "workflows",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "contributions",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "conversations",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "Recently, agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems have significantly transformed the way LLMs retrieve, organize, and present information [30, 43]. Agentic RAG enhances tradi- tional RAG paradigm by enabling systems to plan retrieval strate- gies, invoke external tools, adaptively refine queries, and validate context [18]. These capabilities underpin recent Deep Research systems [13], which support",
      "extractCut": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-002-2-related-work",
      "number": "2",
      "title": "Related Work",
      "level": 1,
      "pageStart": 2,
      "pageEnd": 3,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 366,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "related",
          "heading": true
        },
        {
          "term": "pdf",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "docs",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "description",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "equation",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "latex",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "full-text",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "embed",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "Our work builds upon three research directions that collectively define the landscape of multimodal document understanding. Document Parsing Strategies. Document parsing approaches fall into three categories, each with distinct tradeoffs. Shallow parsing relies on OCR to extract text while discarding spatial and visual information [31]. Deep parsing systems like MinerU [39] preserve layout structure through bounding",
      "extractCut": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-003-33-multimodal-deep-research",
      "number": "3.3",
      "title": "Multimodal Deep Research",
      "level": 2,
      "pageStart": 3,
      "pageEnd": 3,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 102,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "vdocrag",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "merged",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "combines",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "lacking",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "Figure 2: Doc-Researcher Architecture: (a) multimodal deep parsing and indexing, and (b) multimodal deep research. Document RAG Systems. Due to limited context windows, DocRAG systems have merged that decompose understanding into retrieval and reasoning stages. Current systems [3, 6, 12] employ various strategies: M3DocRAG uses vision-only page re- trieval, MDocAgent combines text chunks with screenshots, and",
      "extractCut": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-004-3-method-doc-researcher",
      "number": "3",
      "title": "Method: Doc-Researcher",
      "level": 1,
      "pageStart": 3,
      "pageEnd": 3,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 52,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "pipeline",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "plex",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "solve",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "Doc-Researcher (in Figure 2) consists of two main modules: deep parsing and deep research. The deep parsing pipeline transforms multimodal documents into structured, multi-granular, and search- able units while preserving multimodal semantics. The deep re- search adopts a multi-agent collaborative framework to solve com- plex questions with iterative search and refinement. 3.1",
      "extractCut": false
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-005-31-deep-multimodal-document-parsing",
      "number": "3.1",
      "title": "Deep Multimodal Document Parsing",
      "level": 2,
      "pageStart": 3,
      "pageEnd": 3,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 229,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "box coordinates",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "through layout-aware",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "bounding box",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "elements",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "doc",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "strategy",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "figure",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "chunking",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "Multi-modal Doc Parsing. Given a collection of multimodal doc- uments D, each document 𝑑𝑖∈D undergoes layout-aware parsing via MinerU [39] to extract structural elements 𝐸𝑖= {𝑒𝑖,𝑗,𝑘}, where indices denote document 𝑖, page 𝑗, and reading sequence 𝑘. Each el- ement is pair with its layout type (text, table, figure, equation), and bounding box coordinates (Figure 5a). For computational efficiency, we perform",
      "extractCut": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-006-32-multimodal-retrieval-architecture",
      "number": "3.2",
      "title": "Multimodal Retrieval Architecture",
      "level": 2,
      "pageStart": 3,
      "pageEnd": 4,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 813,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "human domains",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "computational efficiency",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "textual conversion",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "approach",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "loop",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "vision retrievers",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "costs",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "during",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "Vision-only Retrieval. Vision-only retrieval operates at page gran- ularity using raw screenshots as encoded passages. This approach eliminates parsing overhead, offering high efficiency without OCR or layout analysis. However, it faces challenges in representing complex interleaved text-vision content through dense vectors. For high-resolution pages, multi-vector vision retrievers can produce thousands of vectors,",
      "extractCut": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-007-4-m4docbench-benchmark",
      "number": "4",
      "title": "M4DocBench Benchmark",
      "level": 1,
      "pageStart": 4,
      "pageEnd": 4,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 1,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [],
      "extract": "4.1",
      "extractCut": false
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-008-41-motivation-of-m4docbench",
      "number": "4.1",
      "title": "Motivation of M4DocBench",
      "level": 2,
      "pageStart": 4,
      "pageEnd": 5,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 236,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "datasets",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "multi-modal",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "existing",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "chains",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "benchmark",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "evaluation",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "multi-turn",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "multi-hop",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "Existing evaluation benchmarks fail to capture the complexity of multimodal document deep research. A comprehensive evaluation must assess four critical dimensions: (1) Multi-hop reasoning: Complex questions requiring sophisticated reasoning chains across evidence. (2) Multi-modal integration: Questions demanding information from at least two modalities (text, tables, images). (3) Multi-document synthesis: Questions",
      "extractCut": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-009-42-domain-and-document-collection",
      "number": "4.2",
      "title": "Domain and Document Collection",
      "level": 2,
      "pageStart": 5,
      "pageEnd": 5,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 165,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "averaging",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "insurance",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "words",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "domain",
          "heading": true
        },
        {
          "term": "finance",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "education",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "We select four distinct domains (research, insurance, education, and finance) based on three criteria: (1) Multimodal richness: Each domain features essential visual elements (tables, charts, figures) in- tegrated with text; (2) Reasoning complexity: Questions require diverse capabilities from technical comprehension to numerical analysis; (3) Practical relevance: These represent real-world sce- narios where",
      "extractCut": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-010-43-annotation-process",
      "number": "4.3",
      "title": "Annotation Process",
      "level": 2,
      "pageStart": 5,
      "pageEnd": 5,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 249,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "annotation",
          "heading": true
        },
        {
          "term": "checklists",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "evaluation",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "enabling",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "enable",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "decomposition",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "process",
          "heading": true
        },
        {
          "term": "levels",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "Our annotation process employs PhD/Master-level researchers with extensive research experience to ensure benchmark quality. Beyond basic question-answer pairs, we annotate six critical dimensions that enable comprehensive evaluation of deep research systems: • Hard Negative Documents: We carefully curate documents that share topical similarity with target questions while lacking essential information. This tests",
      "extractCut": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-011-44-benchmark-statistics",
      "number": "4.4",
      "title": "Benchmark Statistics",
      "level": 2,
      "pageStart": 5,
      "pageEnd": 5,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 132,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "statistics",
          "heading": true
        },
        {
          "term": "average",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "testing",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "complexity",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "output",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "Table 7 presents statistics of M4DocBench’s 158 expert-annotated questions, demonstrating its unique evaluation capabilities: (1) Document-scale Complexity. Questions require processing 12.7 documents (306.4 pages) on average, up to 42 documents (836 pages) in challenging cases. Systems must identify 3.8 relevant documents from extensive collections, testing critical document filtering ca- pabilities underexplored",
      "extractCut": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-012-5-experiment",
      "number": "5",
      "title": "Experiment",
      "level": 1,
      "pageStart": 5,
      "pageEnd": 5,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 1,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [],
      "extract": "5.1",
      "extractCut": false
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-013-51-evaluation-metrics-and-benchmarks",
      "number": "5.1",
      "title": "Evaluation Metrics and Benchmarks",
      "level": 2,
      "pageStart": 5,
      "pageEnd": 6,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 1034,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "bge-m jina",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "qwen jina",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "multi reranking",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "dense",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "jina-embedding-v",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "evaluation",
          "heading": true
        },
        {
          "term": "dsewiki",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "sparse",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "Multimodal Retrieval Evaluation. We evaluate retrieval per- formance at three granularities aligned with our retrieval frame- work (§3.2): document, page, and layout. For each granularity, we compute recall@k by comparing retrieved passages2 against gold annotations. Document and page recall are computed using exact ID matching. For chunk-level evaluation, following Dong et al. [5], we calculate recall based on",
      "extractCut": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-014-52-system-setting-and-baselines",
      "number": "5.2",
      "title": "System Setting and Baselines",
      "level": 2,
      "pageStart": 6,
      "pageEnd": 7,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 903,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "retrievers encode",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "vision retrievers",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "direct",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "qwen3-235b",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "qwen3-32b",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "jina",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "long-context",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "deepseek-r",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "Retrieval System. We evaluate 10 retrievers to implement our multimodal retrieval architecture (§3.2): 5 Text retrievers: BM25 [28], E5 [40], BGE-M3 [2], Qwen3-embedding-0.6B [45], and Qwen3- reranker-0.6B [45]. 5 Vision retrievers: DSE [22], ColPali [10], ColQwen [10], and Jina-embedding-v4 [11] (multi-vector and dense variants). We configure these retrievers in three paradigms: (1) Text-only: Text retrievers",
      "extractCut": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-015-53-multimodal-retrieval-system-results",
      "number": "5.3",
      "title": "Multimodal Retrieval System Results",
      "level": 2,
      "pageStart": 7,
      "pageEnd": 7,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 202,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "method",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "improves",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "jina-embedding-v",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "qwen3-embedding",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "performance",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "recall",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "sub-query",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "decomposition",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "Table 2 presents retrieval performance across different paradigms on M4DocBench and MMDocIR, evaluating both original questions and decomposed sub-queries. Fine-grained results are in Figure 7. Retrieval Paradigm Comparison. Text-only retrieval shows hierarchical performance: sparse retrieval (BM25) performs worst, while dense retrievers (BGE-M3, Qwen3-Embedding) achieve sub- stantial improvements. Vision-only",
      "extractCut": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-016-54-main-results-multimodal-deep-research",
      "number": "5.4",
      "title": "Main Results: Multimodal Deep Research",
      "level": 2,
      "pageStart": 7,
      "pageEnd": 8,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 291,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "achieves",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "despite",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "validates",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "long-context",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "simplistic",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "recall",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "doc",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "workflows",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "Table 3 validates our core contributions via systematic comparisons. Deep Research can largely improve multimodal understand- ing. Direct answering achieves only 5-10%; long-context processing ranges within 9-31% despite document content of 96k tokens is given. Results show that neither parametric knowledge nor brute- force context extension can handle research-level complexity. In comparison, Doc-Researcher with",
      "extractCut": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-017-55-ablation-study",
      "number": "5.5",
      "title": "Ablation Study",
      "level": 2,
      "pageStart": 8,
      "pageEnd": 8,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 293,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "turn",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "gains",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "indicating",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "iterations",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "validate",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "improves",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "deepseek-r",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "accuracy",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "We ablate components of Doc-Researcher, and validate different architectural design as follows: Hybrid Retrieval Necessity. Within our deep parsing frame- work, hybrid retrieval (42.4-50.6%) outperforms text-only (39.2- 45.6%) by 3-5%. This shows that even with high-quality textual transcriptions in both coarse and fine-grained level, some visual se- mantics is lost. In comparison, visual encoders that directly",
      "extractCut": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-018-56-parsing-and-deep-research-efficiency",
      "number": "5.6",
      "title": "Parsing and Deep Research Efficiency",
      "level": 2,
      "pageStart": 8,
      "pageEnd": 8,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 282,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "storage",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "dense",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "setting",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "transcription",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "embedding",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "time",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "efficiency",
          "heading": true
        },
        {
          "term": "indexing",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "Table 4 analyzes computational tradeoffs across parsing strategies on M4DocBench’s 304 documents (6,177 pages, 4,146 figures, and 2,739 tables) and deep research latency on 158 questions. Parsing Setting Parsing Latency and Cost Doc-Researcher Latency Level Type Parse Index Caption Store Plan Search Refine Answer free vision:dense - 08:56 - 0.15 - 05:34 19:50:16 03:30:42 vision:multi - 39:14 - 4.33 - 59:47 20:32:23",
      "extractCut": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-019-6-conclusion",
      "number": "6",
      "title": "Conclusion",
      "level": 1,
      "pageStart": 8,
      "pageEnd": 9,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 187,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "existing",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "synthesis",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "We introduced Doc-Researcher, addressing the critical limitation that existing deep research systems cannot process multimodal doc- uments. Our work identifies and resolves three fundamental gaps in current systems. First, we developed a deep multimodal parsing framework that preserves layout structure and modality-specific characteristics, achieving 11.4% improvement over simplistic OCR approaches. Second, we",
      "extractCut": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-020-references",
      "number": null,
      "title": "References",
      "level": 1,
      "pageStart": 9,
      "pageEnd": 13,
      "labelStart": null,
      "labelEnd": null,
      "words": 4564,
      "summary": null,
      "keywords": [
        {
          "term": "arxiv",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "pdf",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "yong liu",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "computer vision",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "input output",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "retrieval-augmented generation",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "different domains",
          "heading": false
        },
        {
          "term": "zhang",
          "heading": false
        }
      ],
      "extract": "[1] Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, Sibo Song, Kai Dang, Peng Wang, Shijie Wang, Jun Tang, Humen Zhong, Yuanzhi Zhu, Mingkun Yang, Zhaohai Li, Jianqiang Wan, Pengfei Wang, Wei Ding, Zheren Fu, Yiheng Xu, Jiabo Ye, Xi Zhang, Tianbao Xie, Zesen Cheng, Hang Zhang, Zhibo Yang, Haiyang Xu, and Junyang Lin. 2025. Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report. arXiv:2502.13923 [cs.CV]",
      "extractCut": true
    }
  ],
  "checks": {},
  "withheld": false,
  "keywords": [
    {
      "term": "doc turn",
      "heading": false
    },
    {
      "term": "doc relevant",
      "heading": false
    },
    {
      "term": "doc selection",
      "heading": false
    },
    {
      "term": "vision retrievers",
      "heading": false
    },
    {
      "term": "free vision",
      "heading": false
    },
    {
      "term": "doc ument",
      "heading": false
    },
    {
      "term": "qwen jina",
      "heading": false
    },
    {
      "term": "chen zhang",
      "heading": false
    },
    {
      "term": "multi turn",
      "heading": false
    },
    {
      "term": "computer vision",
      "heading": false
    },
    {
      "term": "bge-m jina",
      "heading": false
    },
    {
      "term": "dense vectors",
      "heading": false
    }
  ],
  "links": {
    "repo": "litlfred/folio-assistant-core",
    "branch": "main",
    "dir": "library/arxiv-2510.21603v1"
  }
}